Third-party TV application store which is better? Seven market software comparison

The data shows that in 2014, the mainstream smart TV brands in China generated sales of 31.1 million, and the market penetration rate was close to 70%, which means that smart TVs have gradually entered our lives. Smart TV accesses all kinds of applications through open platforms, subverting the concept that traditional TVs can only see, and brings us a richer experience of playing games.

Most domestic smart TVs are based on Android system development. However, unlike the Android mobile phone market, which is mainly based on third-party application stores, mainstream smart TV manufacturers are equipped with their own TV application stores, such as Hisense's poly-use, TCL's Huanfu Store, and LeTV. Application stores, etc.; but the early third-party applications market, such as sofa butlers and sofa butlers, also occupy a certain market share. The smart TV application market is not yet mature, and the application delivery echelon has not yet formed. Which application store actually performs better? Xiao Bian chose seven well-known smart TV application stores and analyzed them one by one from the perspective of products and operations.

test environment

Note: In addition to the Xiaomi TV application store and Ali cloud application market that need to run on its own UI, other stores can run on the Android version system that meets the requirements. Therefore, the test terminal uses the millet box and the Tmall box.

Test sample:

Test Terminal: Millet Box/Tmall Box

System environment: Android 4.2

Network environment: 50 M wifi

First, open speed

Millet and Ali shops have high adaptability to their own systems, and they have the best start-up time. They have the smallest package installation time and they take longer to start. Under the same conditions, although the LeTV application store has the largest installation package, it takes the shortest time to start the two platforms and is faster than other application stores.